![]() ![]() Lindsey Graham has said he would support such a measure if Russia used chemical weapons in Ukraine. Adam Kinzinger, both Republicans, have endorsed the idea, while Sen. policymakers have joined public calls for a no-fly zone. Enforcing a no-fly zone would almost certainly mean NATO attacks on Russian aircraft as well as Russian air defense systems. public approved of enforcing a no-fly zone over Ukraine but just 31 percent expressed support for shooting down Russian aircraft over Ukraine. An Economist/YouGov poll conducted between March 5 and 8 found that 40 percent of the U.S. However, recent surveys also suggest that the public may not understand what enforcing a no-fly zone entails, even as they endorse the tactic. A CBS News/YouGov poll conducted between March 8 and 11 showed that 59 percent of people said they would support a no-fly zone, while 41 percent were opposed. In a Reuters/Ipsos survey conducted on March 3 and 4, 74 percent of those surveyed said they would support a no-fly zone over Ukraine, while subsequent polls suggest lower but still substantial support. public, which has expressed broad and bipartisan support for a no-fly zone. The IR experts’ responses contrast with polling of the U.S. Overwhelming opposition to a U.S.-imposed no-fly zone holds irrespective of academic rank, gender, theoretical framework, regional area of expertise, or subject area of expertise. In the nearly 20 years that the TRIP Project has surveyed IR scholars, no contemporary policy question of significant consequence has generated this level of agreement. policy responses that Russia may perceive as escalatory. Overall, the message is clear: IR experts are generally unwilling to support U.S. Support for cyberattacks against Russian forces was also quite low, with just 29 percent of respondents backing the idea. policy response less popular than a no-fly zone was a more general military campaign against Russian forces. policy responses, including sanctions against the Russian government and its leaders, resettling Ukrainian refugees in the United States, sending military supplies to Ukraine, banning oil and gas purchases from Russia, and deploying more military forces to the region. When asked whether the United States should respond to the Russian invasion of Ukraine by imposing a no-fly zone over Ukraine, just 7 percent of respondents agreed. Respondents reject a U.S.-enforced no-fly zone because they fear it raises the risk of escalation, including the likelihood of a Russian nuclear attack against Ukraine or NATO countries. ![]() These experts are nearly unanimous in their opposition to the establishment and enforcement of a no-fly zone over Ukraine. The results reported below are based on responses from 866 respondents surveyed between March 10 and 14. air power to enforce a no-fly zone over Ukraine. ![]() universities and colleges for their views on the use of U.S. The Teaching, Research, and International Policy (TRIP) Project at William & Mary’s Global Research Institute asked IR scholars at U.S. International relations (IR) experts overwhelmingly agree with Biden. Direct confrontation between NATO and Russia is World War III, something we must strive to prevent,” he said. “We will not fight a war against Russia in Ukraine. Last Friday, Biden underscored this view. and Russian forces and risk uncontrollable escalation-the “exact step that we want to avoid,” as White House press secretary Jen Psaki said on March 3. They argue that the policy would lead to direct combat between U.S. President Joe Biden and his advisors have consistently rejected the idea of a NATO-enforced no-fly zone over Ukraine. Estonia, which shares a border with Russia, became the first NATO member to pass a resolution calling for a no-fly zone on Monday.ĭespite these calls, U.S. legislators still advocate the establishment and enforcement of a no-fly zone. Although public support for the policy has somewhat declined in recent days, some U.S. air power to limit further Russian airstrikes in Ukraine. In the immediate aftermath of Russia’s invasion on Feb. Congress, where he reiterated his now familiar plea to the United States and NATO to “close the sky over Ukraine” and enforce a no-fly zone. On Wednesday, Zelensky appeared via video link before a joint session of the U.S. His courage in leading Ukraine in the face of the Russian invasion has drawn comparisons to figures from Winston Churchill to George Washington. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has garnered widespread sympathy for his country’s cause. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |